Policy Blog Templates (81)

SIIA’s Opposition to Chicago Ordinance 2-68-050: Data Residency Requirements

The Software & Information Industry Association (SIIA) is urging the City Council of Chicago to reject Ordinance 2-68-050, which mandates data residency requirements for City data. SIIA represents approximately 375 companies involved in various sectors of digital content and information services. In their letter, SIIA argues that the ordinance, which would localize data storage within the city or state, would have negative unintended consequences. These include increased cybersecurity risks, as centralizing data locally would make it a more visible target for malicious actors. Additionally, the ordinance could impede the use of advanced cloud computing solutions that offer greater efficiency and security.

Moreover, SIIA highlights the financial impact of the ordinance. The proposed data localization would drive up costs by requiring the City to build and maintain local data storage infrastructure, eliminating the cost-saving benefits of current cloud-based, large-scale solutions. These increased storage costs would strain the City’s budget and reduce overall revenue. SIIA’s letter emphasizes that this policy would ultimately undermine its intended goals, and they welcome further discussion with the Committee on this issue.

Policy Blog Templates (79)

SIIA Statement on the DOJ’s Lawsuit Targeting Google’s Online Advertising Services

The following statement from the Software and Information Industry Association (SIIA) regarding the Department of Justice (DOJ) and state attorneys general’s antitrust lawsuit against Google’s ad tech that begins today can be attributed to Paul Lekas, Senior Vice President, Global Public Policy.

SIIA remains deeply concerned by the decision to bring this litigation. The ad tech space is a dynamic and highly competitive one in which low barriers to entry have resulted in continuing innovation. The action taken by the Department of Justice and state attorneys general would benefit Google’s competitors in the ad tech space, not the small and medium-sized businesses that choose to use Google’s innovative ad tech offerings because they make it easier to access dozens of non-Google platforms as well as Google services.

In such an environment, it’s a bedrock principle that private businesses may decide whether to do business with competitors, and on what terms. Google is already doing more than the law requires by providing its competitors with access to its products, thereby allowing customers to fashion the solution that works best for them. Given the robustly competitive online advertising environment, the case is ill-advised and risks setting a dangerous precedent that would erode competition and innovation.

Policy Blog Templates (78)

SIIA Joins Over 70 Organizations in Opposing NextNav’s FCC Petition

SIIA joins over 70 organizations in opposing NextNav’s petition to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regarding the reorganization of the 902-928 MHz band. The coalition argues that NextNav’s proposal to create a 5G terrestrial-based Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) network could severely disrupt the operations of Part 15 unlicensed devices, which are critical across various industries. These devices, which rely on this frequency band, play a key role in sectors such as municipal infrastructure, utilities, railroads, and agriculture. The coalition stresses that current FCC rules requiring coexistence testing protect these devices from harmful interference, and eliminating these protections could cause significant disruption to both public and commercial operations.

The letter highlights how Part 15 devices drive productivity and safety in areas like smart home systems, tolling, retail operations, and agriculture. The coalition disputes NextNav’s claim that the band is underutilized and expresses concern over the lack of technical analysis provided in the petition. They urge the FCC to maintain existing rules that safeguard Part 15 devices, allowing industries to continue benefiting from the band’s reliable communication capabilities. Without these protections, innovations and essential services across multiple sectors could face widespread disruptions.

Policy Blog Templates (31)

Defending Democracy, Not Silencing It: Why SIIA and Partners Oppose AB 2655

The Software & Information Industry Association (SIIA), along with the California Chamber of Commerce (CalChamber), NetChoice, TechNet, and the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA), urged California Governor Gavin Newsom to veto AB 2655. These organizations acknowledge the importance of addressing online election disinformation but argue that AB 2655 would not effectively achieve this goal. They contend that the bill wrongly assumes that online platforms can accurately determine manipulated content and could lead to over-blocking of political speech, infringing on First Amendment rights.

The coalition further argues that AB 2655 imposes impractical requirements on large platforms and risks excluding smaller ones where misinformation may also appear. They express concerns about the bill’s enforcement provisions, which they believe could cause platforms to remove more content than necessary, including truthful election information, due to the stringent timeline for compliance and fear of liability. Instead, they advocate for AB 2355, which focuses on holding accountable those creating misleading content rather than the platforms hosting it. The letter concludes by emphasizing the need for a balanced approach that avoids chilling online political speech.

"We are all for defending democracy from deepfake deception. This is a problem in need of a solution, but there is no easy fix. The legislation would demand that platforms make complicated value judgments about political content without clear guidance and apply 'state-of-the-art techniques' that do not exist. This bill will not stop bad actors, and the threat of legal liability will lead platforms to remove legitimate political speech. The use of disinformation to further partisan political goals is an important issue that should be addressed constructively by government, industry, and civil society."
Paul Lekas
Senior Vice President, Global Public Policy
Q&A - SIIA Media (1)

With Large Staff of ‘Technologists,’ ASI Prospers Through Strong Leadership, Acquisitions, Events and AI

Tim Andrews, president and CEO of the Advertising Specialty Institute (ASI), is a big proponent of sustainability and AI, worries about consolidation, and says only the excitement of it all keeps him up at night.

“If there’s a B2B player that isn’t thinking about how sustainability is in their industry, I think that’s a mistake,” Andrews, president and CEO of ASI since 2002, told me recently in a Zoom Interview. “Frankly, they need to be thinking about that, because even if the participants in their industry aren’t yet focused on it—and I’m doubtful there’s any industry where there aren’t people focused on it—they have players and important [people who are].”

Andrews leads a staff of 350 for a company that serves a network of 25,000 suppliers, distributors and decorators in the $26 billion promotional products industry. Yes $26 billion. He started as a journalist at Dow Jones before moving into a variety of roles there. He then ran the B2B publishing division at Primedia, before being recruited to join ASI, a family-owned company founded in the mid-‘50s.

“Interestingly enough, ASI’s workforce is about the same size it was 22 years ago when I joined, but it’s a very different makeup of skills and work and effort,” Andrews said. “We have around 140 technologists now. We had 24 technologists 20 years ago. So we really have transformed the work that people are doing and the challenges that they’re overcoming—and in terms of the kinds of things we’re doing from a product perspective.”

In late April, ASI acquired PRINTING United Alliance, a member-based printing and graphic arts association. The deal included a magazine, website, search engine for product search—“which is important in our promotional products industry,” Andrews said—and some valuable hosted buyer events, adding to the ones ASI already has.

“That will allow us to help people that sell promotional products today understand how to add print products to their portfolio for their customers,” Andrews said, “and also allow them to be much more knowledgeable about the different decks. That’s a very hyper-innovative space right now… So it’s really a great win for ASI—and our members as well.”

I asked Andrews what worries him. He mentioned the trade shows—that attendance and exhibitors have not quite returned to 2019 levels yet—but then quickly said, “It’s not really keeping me up at night. I would say consolidation. We can all look at different industries where consolidation has been okay and appropriate. But then we can also look at a lot of industries where consolidation has been very hurtful to the industry that’s being served, and to the people that are being served.”

ASI’s news page shows at least 5 M&A deals in the industry in the last month alone, the biggest being S&S Activewear acquiring alphabroder—the second- and third-largest suppliers in the field.

But then Andrews flashed his positive personality. “I probably think if something is keeping me up at night, it’s how exciting a time it is to live and work. Who would have thought we could be using AI in the ways we [do], or technologies?… So if I’m losing sleep. It’s about exciting things, not negative things.”

Here is more from our Q&A:

SIIA Media Alert: The M&A trend in your industry mirrors in some ways those in the B2B space. How do you look at that?
Tim Andrews: There are a lot of examples of mergers that frankly have not worked out so well. Some do, and some don’t. That’s always the concern of distributors who are buying from these suppliers… ASI just did an acquisition, and so I certainly know the pain points of bringing an organization together from a technology, people and product perspective. And so [it is with] these big mergers, across the entire B2B spectrum. And I’ve been watching these for 25 years.

I’ve written about sustainability in our industry and haven’t sensed a huge urgency—except maybe Questex which has an initiative. But in your industry it has to be very big. How do you approach that?
Typically, sustainability is really quite important for us because so many of the organizations [we serve] are targeting people who care about the planet. We thought 10 years ago this was maybe a trend [but] it’s really turned into a global movement… All the products we want to have kept forever. But we know that sometimes they have a lifespan. So we want to make sure that whatever is being created and distributed represents the brands and the values of the brand, but also that these are products that are in fact manufactured and distributed in a very sustainable way. In fact, we were writing so much about it that we actually set up a resource site on our website separately that’s called Promo for the Planet.

Perhaps other media companies don’t have members who deal with sustainability like you do. But it’s going to affect them at some point.
Any B2B organization that’s serving its industry needs to be thinking about how do we help that transparency? How do we educate people about what this is, what the different terms are, how to be appropriate in sourcing product and shipping product. And really in all aspects. So I think it’s a huge, huge area for every single B2B player… And certainly as younger buyers and participants come into the purchasing of any product, they’ll want to know, ‘Where did this product come from? Is it safe?’ And they want that transparency of the supply chain.

You have a big event coming up in October.
The ASI Power Summit is about 150 C-level individuals in our industry that we bring together once a year. It’s an invitation-only event, and we really try to [encourage leaders] to talk about the big topics in our industry. We’ll be just about 2 or 3 weeks out from the election, so we want to help our industry participants understand the key topics and what is likely to happen after the election. We also have a number of large trade shows and other activities.

I read a very good article you wrote about a year ago on AI. How is AI affecting your organization and how do you use it?
I look at it in two different ways. One is, how are we using it internally, and then how we’re using it with our products. First of all internally, we’re using it tons from everything like taking a marketing piece that’s an email and asking AI to write five versions of it… or five subject lines and then testing and tweaking those. And then, from an external perspective, we’re actually embedding AI in some of our products. For instance, ESP is a product database and a technology platform that our distributors use to create presentations for their clients. We’ve added AI, so that at the beginning of the creation of the presentation, the user of the platform puts in the name of the client and the event that they’re buying promotional products for. And our software or our AI looks at the entire website of that organization and… drafts the subject line and uses the colors from the website and logo to customize the presentation.

That’s interesting. Much of the National Journal’s successful transition pivoted on creating presentations. Members really desired them.
It’s amazing what the tools can do. I’m using [AI] every day, and frequently for all sorts of things. So if people are not using something as basic as ChatGBT, or the Microsoft version that’s built in, [they should be]. It’s really something that can be used all day looking for information. It’s really an amazing thing. I was asked recently by one of our employees, “Is this going to eliminate jobs?” My answer was, “The only people who might lose their jobs because of AI are people that don’t use AI.”